Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Cyber resilience»The next generation of SOC: a future-ready solution (Page 7)
Cyber resilience

The next generation of SOC: a future-ready solution

As organizations increasingly decentralise and adopt diverse technologies, the traditional security operations centre / center (SOC) model is struggling to keep pace with the expanding attack surface and volume of data to be monitored and protected. This shift necessitates a reimagining of SOCs to remain effective and agile amidst ever-evolving threats and business landscapes. In this article, James Todd explores how to design a future-ready SOC, proposing a new reference architecture to tackle these challenges.
August 13, 20246 Mins Read
An abstract view of blue building blocks illustrates the concept of building a future-ready SOC

The decentralisation of organizations and the software they use has expanded the attack surface to a point where most security operations centres (SOC) struggle to keep up with the volume of data required to monitor and protect these systems.

A decade ago, the SOC collected, stored and processed alerts in a single location. However, since then, organizations have changed how they purchase software, IT services, and hardware. This decentralisation has resulted in individual business units and functions having to take control and ownership of larger, more significant volumes of data and, where this isn’t possible, having to surrender certain application controls and oversight to external providers, notably hyperscale cloud providers.

My organization, Adarma, a leading managed SOC provider, recently released a report titled ‘How to Design a Future-Ready SOC’,  in which we propose a new reference architecture for remaining adaptable and agile in the face of ongoing change. This change could pertain to the threat landscape, technology environment, or the circumstances of the business the SOC endeavours to protect. The concept of a future-ready SOC aims to overcome many of the issues that traditional SOCs currently face. For many organizations, the current manual process and resource-heavy approach along with monitoring multiple vendor technologies has resulted in observability gaps, tool overlap, exploding volumes of data, and difficulty hiring and retaining skilled staff.

How does the future-ready SOC work?

The future-ready SOC is distinguished by its open and extensible architecture, allowing internally developed capabilities to sit alongside leading vendor technologies without any historical issues with lock-in. This enables an organization to benefit from collaboration across in-house capabilities and trusted partners. A future-ready SOC works by implementing the following:

Open architecture

Open architecture allows an organization’s in-house capabilities to coexist and collaborate with priority vendor technologies, enabling better innovation and adaptability. The architecture should also be extensible, reducing dependency on a single vendor and facilitating the adoption of new technologies.

Data acquisition and storage

For a future-ready SOC to be effective, it needs to be able to gather, process, and store relevant data from various sources and use it to enhance security. There are two key aspects to data gathering in a future-ready SOC:

  • An organization’s ability to recognise the value of different types of data in a security context.
  • The ability to efficiently and cost-effectively extract, route, and store this data. By prioritising data, the SOC can send it where it’s most useful, and store it in the right place and format to maximise cost efficiency. Data pipelining technology is a new approach that can help achieve this, while also reducing data intake and storage expenses.

Federated detection and response

Within a future-ready SOC, detection and response should be orchestrated to minimise the time to respond and to maximise the effectiveness of a response. The primary objective of a federated detection and response model is to enable quick recovery of information from a distributed enterprise environment. The local SOC must then use its own detection and response capabilities and storage to improve mean time to detect (MTTD) and meantime to respond (MTTR) without running up data transfer costs. A federated approach should heavily rely on centrally orchestrating detection logic and intervention techniques.

Continuous Posture Assessment

Continuous posture assessment (CPA) aims to combine the data outputs of vulnerability management, attack surface management, and breach and attack simulation. In a future-ready SOC architecture, posture assessment must be continual and sustained. The information provided from these combined assessments allows organizations to understand critical assets, the expanse of relevant IT environments, and the overall security posture of an organization. CPA should catch and provide the real-time data used to inform an organization of how best to interact with assets, remediate issues, and reduce waste all in consideration of the ultimate goal: cyber resilience.

Machine learning and artificial intelligence

Considering analyst fatigue is a real concern within the traditional SOC model, it is important for the next generation of SOCs, like most cybersecurity solutions, to embrace machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) as an aid. By using this growing technology to cut through the noise, analysts can focus on more unique or significant concerns.

By carefully experimenting, organizations that purposefully adopt technology like ML and AI can use these tools as a first line of defence. With AI trained to flag any baseline deviations in behaviour, organizations can then focus on the more significant, higher-level concerns. Security professionals believe that AI and ML will greatly benefit cybersecurity. Indeed, an Adarma survey of 500 security leaders from last year found that over half of the respondents believed AI could theoretically effectively manage up to 30% of security operations.

Ready to take the leap?

A future-ready SOC is a comprehensive solution that enhances visibility across all the environments under monitoring. Companies opting for this approach will not only experience improved security and teamwork but also ongoing adjustments to stay ahead of threats. A future-ready SOC truly represents the next generation. However, organizations looking into this path must first assess the status of their current SOC.

Before transitioning to a future-ready SOC, businesses should ask themselves the following questions:

  • Does your organization understand its security posture against emerging threats?
  • Can your organization adapt its threat response as business priorities and functions change with time?
  • Does your organization have the in-house capabilities to maximise and manage security investments?
  • Can your organization prioritise against the exponentially increasing vulnerabilities affecting enterprise environments?
  • Does your organization have a broad, easy-access view of all exposures, vulnerabilities, misconfigurations, and threats that are impacting operations or may do so in the future?
  • Can your organization communicate the value of its security operations to leadership?

By asking these questions, organizations can advance into the next generation of SOC with a clear understanding of their current standing. Given the rapid changes in data and asset security methodologies over the past decade, these requirements are likely to keep evolving in the coming years. This emphasises the increasing importance of establishing security operations in a flexible and agile manner, enabling adaptation, evolution, and ultimately, improved cyber resilience.

The author

James Todd is chief technology officer at Adarma

Obtain the full How to Design a Future-Ready SOC here

Africa Asia Asia Pacific Australasia Europe Middle East North America UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleResilience questions to consider when AI is used to control critical infrastructure systems
Next Article Concerns grow over Mpox as the Africa CDC declares that the outbreak has reached a crisis level and WHO designates it a PHEIC

Related Posts

A group of rabbits happily graze while a wolf watches, hidden in the bushes behind them.

Confidence in resilience is outpacing reality, according to new report

November 13, 2026
An upward trending arrow.

Organizations are being forced to rethink resilience strategies, finds State of IT Infrastructure Resilience study

November 13, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
The numbers 2027 with the 0 replaced with an AI symbol.

From hype to control: AI security, risk management, and governance in 2027

November 13, 2026
Geopolitical risks

Geopolitical conflict is increasingly reshaping how organizations manage people, operations, and risk

November 9, 2026
Abstract network of interconnected nodes and lines in blue.

Everbridge publishes its 2027 Global Risk & Resilience Outlook

November 9, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
AI agent in action concept.

Lack of clear activity baselines makes it harder to manage AI agent resilience and security

November 9, 2026
Two different jigsaw pieces.

KPMG Risk & Resilience Survey finds that half of organizations have yet to integrate risk and resilience management

March 12, 2025
A swirl of sand around a rock to show the concept of flexibility.

Organizational flexibility:  developing and managing the ability to be flexible

July 2, 2026
Latest resources
UK Resilience Academy logo

Wargaming in a Resilience Context

August 18, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
An AI agent icon lying on its side with eyes shut showing the concept of a deactivated agent.

New report reveals major operational resilience gaps in agentic AI adoption

Two hands form a rectangular frame around the sun in a bright sky over distant mountains.

BCI Future of Resilience Report points to a more strategic future for resilience

Global risks concept

UN report warns that the global risk landscape is being redrawn

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?