Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Risk»Threatscape»The 2025 New Generation of Risk Report (Page 12)
Threatscape

The 2025 New Generation of Risk Report

October 22, 20253 Mins Read
Risk barometer on red

Riskonnect has published its 2025 New Generation of Risk Report, based on a global survey of more than 200 risk, compliance, and resilience professionals.

The study found that political risk has climbed into the top-three corporate threats, rising from fifth place in 2024. 97% of risk leaders say that political risks are impacting the business in some way, with 40% categorizing the impact as ‘significant’ or ‘severe.’ Companies have slowed or stalled hiring (37%), delayed major tech investments or capital expenditures (28%), delayed expansion plans (23%), and diversified supply chains or reshored operations (27%) because of domestic political instability.

Other key findings include:

Companies are underestimating their third-party exposures
Most respondents (85%) say they have a business continuity and resilience plan to keep their organization running in the event of a major IT outage or cyber incident at one of their business-critical service providers. Only 8%, however, can assess and monitor their tier-one partners, their suppliers, and their suppliers’ suppliers, indicating vulnerabilities lurk deep in the digital supply chain.

Geopolitical risk planning is gaining ground
Two-thirds (66%) of companies entered 2025 with a plan for managing geopolitical volatility, up from the 19% who said they had a plan in 2024.

Risk representation in the C-suite is growing
60% of organizations now have a chief risk officer, up from 52% over the past two years, reflecting the rising strategic importance of the function.

Risk leaders are leaning into AI 
Last year, 62% of companies were using or planned to use AI to help manage risk. In 2025, that figure has jumped to 70% and top use cases include risk assessments (34%), risk forecasting (28%), scenario planning and simulations (28%), creating risk registers (28%), and surfacing risks that they hadn’t previously considered (28%).

More companies are preparing for worst-case scenarios
61% of risk leaders say they have simulated their worst-case scenario, up from 44% in 2024 and 37% in 2023.

Companies are largely flying blind on AI

Generative AI oversight still lags in critical areas. 42% of companies say they don’t have a policy to govern the use of AI by employees and 72% don’t have a policy for use of genAI by partners and suppliers. Three-quarters (75%) don’t have a dedicated plan for addressing genAI risks, including deepfakes and AI-driven fraud attacks. Only 15% say they have a budget directed at mitigating AI-related risks and only 23% have a policy against using foreign AI models such as DeepSeek.

Training on AI risks is trending in the right direction: 32% say they’ve formally trained or briefed their entire company on risks related to genAI, up from 19% in 2024 and 17% in 2023.

Even as agentic AI enters the risk landscape, organizations’ proactivity when it comes to AI risk management and oversight is lacking. 59% of risk leaders say their organizations are considering incorporating agentic AI solutions into their operations or products, but over half (55%) of those leaders admit they haven’t formally assessed the risks.

Obtain the report
Africa Asia Asia Pacific Australasia Europe Middle East North America UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleBeyond awareness: engineering resilience against Shadow AI
Next Article Cybersecurity teams are struggling to keep up with the expanding attack surface

Related Posts

An exploding digital padlock illustrates the requirement for post-quantum cryptography.

Research breakthrough brings reliable quantum computers and Q-day closer to reality

September 10, 2026
A danger sign on a digital background.

New blob URL phishing technique evades detection by using legitimate Microsoft services

September 10, 2026
AI risks

Unmanaged AI workflows expose EMEA organizations to rising compliance and data risks

September 9, 2026
City skyline at sunset with bright light trails and a translucent blue smart-city grid overlay and GPS pins indicating locations.

AI world models: future possibilities for organizational resilience?

September 7, 2026
DRJ and BCI logos

DRJ and BCI publish guidance for governing, managing, and using AI in resilience

September 7, 2026
Decision making with over whelming information.

AI can find the vulnerability. Accountability still sits with your crisis leadership

September 7, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
Under pressure: An egg cracking under pressure applied by squeezing clamps form the sides.

Managing scenario testing for operational resilience

May 16, 2024
COSO logo

New COSO ERM guidance aims to help organizations with practical implementation

May 12, 2026
Close-up of a green-brown iris peering through a jagged tear in dark paper or wall material.

The blind spots in business continuity

September 2, 2026
Latest resources
A batch of Euro notes, some which are showing signs of being burned. Image © De Nederlandsche Bank - used under media permissions.

Identifying scenarios of interest under deep uncertainty

April 21, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
A futuristic red warning alert icon with glowing exclamation mark.

Cloud Security Alliance publishes Hugging Face Incident Initial Post-Mortem

A person hold a building door open for a person behind who is tailgating to get unauthorised access.

Security Culture: A Strategic Capability That Builds Resilience in a Volatile World

An identity icon with a map marker on it, indicating the concept of identity as a target for attackers. The icon is on a generic IT background predominantly in black and orange.

Identity-based approaches dominate initial access for ransomware attacks

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?