Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»2026 Predictions»Expected developments in the cyber landscape during 2026 (Page 6)
2026 Predictions

Expected developments in the cyber landscape during 2026

December 9, 20257 Mins Read
Cyber landscape

HP Wolf Security experts have made a number of predictions for how the cyber threat landscape is likely to change in 2026 – and how organizations need to adapt their defences…


Attackers will accelerate their investments in cookie theft

Ian Pratt, HP Global Head of Personal Systems Security at HP Inc.

Generalised multi-factor authentication (MFA) deployment will accelerate threat actors’ switch to stealing cookies and tokens instead of passwords. This means threat actors will need to act swiftly from time of theft, utilising the stolen cookie before it expires to insert backdoors that then grant them persistent access. Online marketplaces will expand to enable this with rapid trading and exploitation.

Defences against cookie and token theft are not mature and they are inconvenient for users. This means that we will see attacks involving such theft becoming increasingly commonplace. This is particularly serious for privileged users such as sysadmins, who frequently use web browsers to access high-value administrative websites, such as Entra ID, Intune, or AWS web portals, where cookie theft creates an easy path to a catastrophic enterprise breach.

Issuing sysadmins with a second PC, a Privileged Access Workstation (PAWs), is today’s recommended best practice, but is far from universally implemented, and there are plenty of examples where PAWs themselves have become compromised. For critical applications, enterprises should look toward additional layers of defence, such as strong isolation and application security posture attestation.


Cybercriminal groups will rely on AI agents to automate reconnaissance and target organizations

Alex Holland, Principal Threat Researcher in the HP Security Lab

In 2026, we expect to see organized crime groups automate workflows and outsource more tasks using AI agents in their attacks, especially preparatory tasks like researching victims to target. Beyond this, rapid improvements in large language models and agentic AI systems are expanding their role in the attack lifecycle. Threat actors will no longer limit their AI use to basic automation or phishing content creation. They will also start using AI to assist with complex tasks like vulnerability discovery.

AI assistance will help threat actors to scale their operations, making campaigns more efficient by reducing the resources and skills attackers need to breach targets.

Against a barrage of AI-assisted attacks, even the best detection tools will miss some threats. Instead, organizations need to ensure threats can be contained, isolated, and remediated, safeguarding their fleets, maximising uptime, and ultimately securing the future of work.


Physical attacks on devices will become cheaper and easier for cybercriminals

Boris Balacheff, Chief Technologist for Security Research and Head of the HP Security Lab

Hybrid work is accelerating the commoditisation of attacks enabled by physical access to devices. This is because devices are more exposed as employees are more mobile and distributed; and the tools needed for device tampering become increasingly accessible and affordable. In 2026, IT leaders should anticipate that this will continue, with easy-to-use exploitation kits and investment by threat actors into new physical attack techniques. In response, security auditors will increasingly focus on how organizations deploy best practices to protect data and device integrity across their fleets of devices.

Employees today work in cafés, bars, hotels, and conference centres across the globe, using shared infrastructure and peripherals – and giving threat actors ample opportunity to tamper with a device when its owner steps away. With physical tampering, threat actors can seek to exfiltrate data, grasp control of compromised devices to gain broader access to enterprise networks, and even mount destructive attacks to brick devices that are not designed with self-healing built in from the ground up. To ensure that the ‘Future of Work’ is secure, organizations will need to prioritise hardware with security and resilience built in at every level. They will need to look for device security capabilities to help protect hardware and firmware integrity, as well as data security, from physical attacks and will need to integrate hardware-level authentication and attestation into their zero-trust architecture strategies.


Organizations will finally take notice of IoT, edge, and print security after a string of attacks

Steve Inch, Global Senior Print Security Strategist at HP Inc.

After a year of high-profile attacks against connected devices, organizations will finally prioritise security for devices at the network edge. For example, security vulnerabilities allowed for remote takeovers of printers, highlighting the risks of leaving printers unprotected.

For too long, printers have been the lowest priority on every security team’s list. Many organizations lack basic visibility and control over print infrastructure. This creates security blind spots – from exploitation attempts to insider threats, outdated firmware, malicious updates, and misconfigurations, such as open ports or unchanged default credentials.

These security gaps give threat actors a potential launchpad to not only compromise a printer and the data it holds, but also other devices on the network. In the year ahead, organizations and governments will demand that endpoint devices like printers come with continuous and active system monitoring throughout their lifecycle.

Organizations need to secure their complete device ecosystem, including their printers. They should prioritise the ability to automate print fleet security compliance and automatically assess fleet firmware vulnerability status, minimising IT overhead in 2026.


Quantum resistance will become a vendor requirement

Thalia Laing, Principal Cryptographer at HP Security Lab

A year on from the introduction of new NIST standards for quantum-resistant asymmetric cryptography, public sector and critical infrastructure companies are going to accelerate planning and vendor engagements to chart a path towards migration. This process will reveal the scale of the challenge: with NIST intending to deprecate RSA-2048 by 2030 and all RSA and Elliptic Curve Cryptography by 2035, many vendors are likely to seize the opportunity to move directly from RSA-2048 to quantum-resistant algorithms, particularly in critical industries and long-life systems, such as hardware.

With ongoing advances in quantum computing, the prospect of a quantum computer capable of breaking asymmetric cryptography within a decade is becoming increasingly plausible. The US Government’s decision to set a quantum-resistance deadline of 2027 for new National Security System devices signals this urgency. [FLAG: Timeline depends on US National Security Memorandum and standards adoption; date may not be universal]

To become quantum resilient, organizations must start by preparing their long-lived hardware, including their printers and PCs. With a typical commercial PC refresh averaging at just over four years and an office-class commercial printer lifespan of between four to five years – devices procured in 2026 have the potential to be in use within the timeframe of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer.

From 2026 onwards, quantum resilience will increasingly influence hardware procurement decisions. This will increase pressure on device manufacturers to future-proof their devices by embedding quantum-resistant cryptography into their products, while pushing for the protection of long-life data.


Identity, provenance, and persistent control

Peter Blanchard, Document Workflow Security Strategy Principal at HP Inc.

In 2026, we’ll see efforts within enterprise security shift from fragmented identity frameworks and perimeter-based controls to a unified, data-centric model. Today’s zero-trust implementations often create complexity and fatigue, with identity scattered across users, apps, and devices. This fragmentation leads to blind spots, inconsistent enforcement, and poor user experience. The next phase will prioritise consolidation: centralised identity orchestration that simplifies access, strengthens governance, and reduces operational risk.

At the same time, we’ll see security move from focusing on point of entry, to managing the custody of data throughout its lifecycle. Organizations will need visibility into where data originates, how it is used, and who has access – even after it leaves their boundaries. Identity and policy will travel with the data, embedded through persistent controls, telemetry, and rich metadata. Dynamic permissions such as ‘can I share this?’ will evolve into continuous oversight, ensuring compliance online and offline.

Provenance and lifecycle control will become critical in the age of AI, where transparency and trust are non-negotiable. By embedding identity, custody, and governance controls into the core of digital ecosystems, organizations will achieve stronger, adaptive security that protects without adding friction, safeguarding the ‘Future of Work’.

Africa Asia Asia Pacific Australasia Europe Middle East North America UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleSolving identity management challenges in 2026
Next Article Risk Outlook report: uncertainty is shaping the pace of preparedness

Related Posts

An exploding digital padlock illustrates the requirement for post-quantum cryptography.

Research breakthrough brings reliable quantum computers and Q-day closer to reality

September 10, 2026
A danger sign on a digital background.

New blob URL phishing technique evades detection by using legitimate Microsoft services

September 10, 2026
AI risks

Unmanaged AI workflows expose EMEA organizations to rising compliance and data risks

September 9, 2026
City skyline at sunset with bright light trails and a translucent blue smart-city grid overlay and GPS pins indicating locations.

AI world models: future possibilities for organizational resilience?

September 7, 2026
DRJ and BCI logos

DRJ and BCI publish guidance for governing, managing, and using AI in resilience

September 7, 2026
Decision making with over whelming information.

AI can find the vulnerability. Accountability still sits with your crisis leadership

September 7, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
Under pressure: An egg cracking under pressure applied by squeezing clamps form the sides.

Managing scenario testing for operational resilience

May 16, 2024
COSO logo

New COSO ERM guidance aims to help organizations with practical implementation

May 12, 2026
Close-up of a green-brown iris peering through a jagged tear in dark paper or wall material.

The blind spots in business continuity

September 2, 2026
Latest resources
Graphic showing a range of risks from green to red grades.

2026 update to the UK National Risk Register published

July 15, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
A futuristic red warning alert icon with glowing exclamation mark.

Cloud Security Alliance publishes Hugging Face Incident Initial Post-Mortem

A person hold a building door open for a person behind who is tailgating to get unauthorised access.

Security Culture: A Strategic Capability That Builds Resilience in a Volatile World

An identity icon with a map marker on it, indicating the concept of identity as a target for attackers. The icon is on a generic IT background predominantly in black and orange.

Identity-based approaches dominate initial access for ransomware attacks

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?