Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Managing resilience»Business continuity»Crisis communications: the tricky balance when it comes to admitting mistakes (Page 16)
Business continuity

Crisis communications: the tricky balance when it comes to admitting mistakes

Organizational mistakes are often the root cause of crises, but should mistakes be admitted to? And how should this be managed?
November 30, 20233 Mins Read
concept shows wooden scale balancing one big ball and four small ones.

CEOs are often in the front-line of crisis communications, but how should messaging be handled when the crisis has been caused by an organizational mistake, or even by a direct mistake by the executive in question?

New research from emlyon business school looks at this area.

Mistakes can harm an organization but also the CEO’s job security, therefore many CEOs don’t admit errors when they happen, however, this risks leaders not learning from these errors; and the organization not changing its practices, making it more likely that the crisis will be repeated.

When there is this clear trade-off between admitting a mistake and potentially losing power and control in the organization, it is important that CEOs use their language effectively to create a safe space for themselves in the organization – but how can they do so? This is the specific research question that Vincent Giolito, Professor of Strategy and Organisation, and Damon Golsorkhi, Professor of Strategic Management at emlyon business school, looked into. To do so, the researchers conducted 21 in-depth interviews with CEOs and board chairs leading 900,000 people in large financial firms in Europe.

The researchers interviewed the CEOs and board chairs on strategic errors in the organization and how they were approached by senior management, as well as the dialect and narrative behind the communication of these errors to all stakeholders. Interestingly, the researchers found a number of key themes that CEOs used for framing these errors.

When discussing key errors with severe economic and/or reputational consequences for the firms and important strategy changes, many CEOs stated that there was a process in which communication follows. First the CEO will acknowledge and diagnose the error, then they will dramatise it to put it into context for stakeholders, and then they will showcase the solution and how they are capitalising on this error to make changes.

The researchers say that it is important to collectivise the issue, using terms like ‘we’ or ‘us’ when discussing the mistake and how to change as a result of it, then there is less blame placed on one person – usually the CEO. Secondly, the researchers use the term, ‘temporalise’, which refers to CEOs showing that the error generates from the organization not adapting or changing quickly enough; and how there is a simple solution to solving the errors – adapting to today’s world quicker.

Thirdly, the researchers say that CEOs should generalise the issue and showcase how all firms in the industry are making the same mistakes, it’s not a firm-level error, but one that many are facing too. And finally, CEOs should isolate the issue, and show that the error is a one-off incident and a rare one; one that will not happen again.

emlyon business school
Europe
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleThe challenges that sell-side firms will face in meeting DORA requirements
Next Article Operational resilience is more than just business continuity says BCBS

Related Posts

An exploding digital padlock illustrates the requirement for post-quantum cryptography.

Research breakthrough brings reliable quantum computers and Q-day closer to reality

September 10, 2026
A danger sign on a digital background.

New blob URL phishing technique evades detection by using legitimate Microsoft services

September 10, 2026
AI risks

Unmanaged AI workflows expose EMEA organizations to rising compliance and data risks

September 9, 2026
City skyline at sunset with bright light trails and a translucent blue smart-city grid overlay and GPS pins indicating locations.

AI world models: future possibilities for organizational resilience?

September 7, 2026
DRJ and BCI logos

DRJ and BCI publish guidance for governing, managing, and using AI in resilience

September 7, 2026
Decision making with over whelming information.

AI can find the vulnerability. Accountability still sits with your crisis leadership

September 7, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
Under pressure: An egg cracking under pressure applied by squeezing clamps form the sides.

Managing scenario testing for operational resilience

May 16, 2024
COSO logo

New COSO ERM guidance aims to help organizations with practical implementation

May 12, 2026
Close-up of a green-brown iris peering through a jagged tear in dark paper or wall material.

The blind spots in business continuity

September 2, 2026
Latest resources
Digital Europe map with stars, symbolizing EU cybersecurity and technology.

ENISA releases guidance to help organizations develop successful cyber security exercises

February 19, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
A futuristic red warning alert icon with glowing exclamation mark.

Cloud Security Alliance publishes Hugging Face Incident Initial Post-Mortem

A person hold a building door open for a person behind who is tailgating to get unauthorised access.

Security Culture: A Strategic Capability That Builds Resilience in a Volatile World

An identity icon with a map marker on it, indicating the concept of identity as a target for attackers. The icon is on a generic IT background predominantly in black and orange.

Identity-based approaches dominate initial access for ransomware attacks

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?