Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Cyber resilience»Zero trust architecture: the key to securing hybrid environments (Page 70)
Cyber resilience

Zero trust architecture: the key to securing hybrid environments

October 25, 20246 Mins Read
A concept of zero trust.

Asher Benbenisty

Hybrid environments have emerged as the new standard for today’s businesses, enabling them to retain agility and a start-up mindset as they expand and grow. According to Allied Market Research, 89% of organizations now use more than one cloud for storage and workloads, just 9% use a single public cloud, and only 2% use a single private cloud solution.  

 Simply put, the next next generation of networks is here, but are businesses ready? Applications are now developed specifically to run in cloud environments, taking advantage of the cloud’s speed, scalability, flexibility, and resilience. These applications use microservice architecture to group individual services together via APIs, allowing them to be tweaked and upgraded without impacting service delivery. How these applications are orchestrated and monitored, alongside their segmentation and configuration, has become a vital part of network security. 

The rapid shift toward hybrid environments has come with many benefits, but the limitations of traditional security models have also become glaringly apparent. Historically, security strategies relied on the concept of a secure perimeter – guarding the gates while assuming everything inside was safe. However, this approach no longer holds up in today’s distributed landscape. The rise of remote work, mobile devices, and the proliferation of sophisticated cyberattacks mean that perimeter-based defences aren’t enough. Endpoints have multiplied, cloud environments have become integrated, and networks have become sprawling webs of interconnectivity. It’s no longer possible to simply draw a protective line around everything and call it quits. Defences are multi-layered, from firewalls and API security to multifactor authentication and employee training.  

 To combat this, zero trust architecture (ZTA) has emerged as a critical evolution in cybersecurity strategy, offering a framework designed to address the complexities of modern digital ecosystems. At its core, zero trust is founded on the principle of ‘never trust, always verify.’ Unlike traditional models that grant implicit trust based on network location, ZTA assumes that no entity – whether inside or outside the network – should be trusted by default. This approach emphasizes the importance of ‘least privilege’ access, ensuring that users and devices are granted only the permissions necessary to perform their tasks. ZTA is more than just a function; it’s a framework containing several core principles. Real-time monitoring of network assets will allow businesses to spot anomalies and potential threats as they occur, and micro-segmentation divides the network into smaller, isolated segments, reducing the potential impact of any security breach.  

These core principles make zero trust not just a trend, but a fundamental shift in security for hybrid cloud. 

The challenges of securing hybrid environments 

Securing hybrid environments, which blend on-premises, public cloud, and private cloud resources, presents a complex challenge for organizations. The diversity of these environments often leads to inconsistent security policies and fragmented visibility, making it difficult to maintain a unified security posture. Each platform comes with its own set of tools and configurations, which can create gaps in defences that cybercriminals are quick to exploit. Managing a wide array of endpoints, each with varying levels of security and often operating from different locations, further complicates the task and increases the risk of unauthorised access. 

The dramatic shift to remote working over the past few years has amplified these challenges tenfold. According to one report, vulnerable attack surface areas grew by 600% in 2023 as businesses added more cyber assets to their organizations. Employees accessing company resources from various locations and devices make perimeter-based security models practically obsolete. In this environment, the need for a more adaptable, comprehensive security approach – one that continuously verifies and controls access instead of just ‘guarding the gates’ – is more critical than ever. 

One such critical element for securing hybrid environments is segmentation. However, research suggests that 75% of surveyed organizations struggle to enforce network segmentation. Why? Many businesses make the mistake of focusing solely on implementing micro-segmentation at the individual device or application level without considering the broader macro-level segmentation strategy, which can lead to inconsistencies in segmentation policies and ineffective isolation of network segments. You wouldn’t build a house without laying the foundations first, and the same principle applies to network segmentation. Macro-segmentation creates boundaries that segment different parts of the network. For example, a business may divide its network into zones such as corporate, guest, and production. This approach ensures sensitive areas, like production servers, are isolated and not exposed to less secure zones, such as guest Wi-Fi networks. This crucial foundational role is fundamental to securing hybrid environments. 

Why zero trust is essential for applications in hybrid environments 

Hybrid environments are dynamic and distributed by their very nature, introducing unique security challenges that traditional security models are ill-equipped to handle. They often rely on microservices, containers, and APIs, each of which can become potential entry points for attackers if not properly secured. It is a double-edged sword: the fluidity and scalability that make hybrid environments so powerful also create a situation where vulnerabilities can spread quickly and go largely unnoticed. This makes it imperative to adopt a security model that is as flexible and comprehensive as the applications themselves. 

A ZTA addresses these risks by ensuring that every interaction within the system is scrutinised and verified, and offers macro-segmentation based on business application isolation. This involves isolating workloads to limit the lateral movement of threats, as well as robust identity and access management to enforce least privilege principles. Continuous verification processes also monitor all traffic, ensuring that any deviation from normal behavior is detected and addressed immediately. By integrating zero trust into hybrid environment architectures, organizations can maintain a high level of security while still reaping the benefits of cloud agility and scalability. 

Granular controls and compliance objectives 

By continuously verifying every user, device, and application, zero trust minimises the risk of unauthorised access, reducing the likelihood of security incidents when the boundaries of trust are constantly shifting. This level of granular control is non-negotiable for businesses that want to continue to ‘guard the perimeter’ when their perimeters are virtually impossible to define.  

Beyond improving security, zero trust also supports regulatory compliance by enforcing strict access controls and maintaining detailed audit trails. These capabilities make it easier for organizations to demonstrate adherence to data protection regulations and industry standards, reducing the risk of costly fines and reputational damage. What’s more, zero trust offers scalability and flexibility, allowing organizations to adapt their security measures as their hybrid environments evolve. This adaptability ensures that as business needs change, security remains a priority, providing a sustainable framework for long-term protection.  

So while businesses might be anxious to embrace the next next generation of networks, they must do so in a way that doesn’t compromise their security.  

The author

Asher Benbenisty, Director of Product Marketing at AlgoSec

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleG7 Cyber Expert Group publishes guidance on planning for quantum resilience
Next Article Research quantifies the business impact of enterprise resource planning downtime

Related Posts

A group of rabbits happily graze while a wolf watches, hidden in the bushes behind them.

Confidence in resilience is outpacing reality, according to new report

November 13, 2026
An upward trending arrow.

Organizations are being forced to rethink resilience strategies, finds State of IT Infrastructure Resilience study

November 13, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
The numbers 2027 with the 0 replaced with an AI symbol.

From hype to control: AI security, risk management, and governance in 2027

November 13, 2026
Geopolitical risks

Geopolitical conflict is increasingly reshaping how organizations manage people, operations, and risk

November 9, 2026
Abstract network of interconnected nodes and lines in blue.

Everbridge publishes its 2027 Global Risk & Resilience Outlook

November 9, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
AI agent in action concept.

Lack of clear activity baselines makes it harder to manage AI agent resilience and security

November 9, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
Two different jigsaw pieces.

KPMG Risk & Resilience Survey finds that half of organizations have yet to integrate risk and resilience management

March 12, 2025
Latest resources
Resilience Framework

BCI launches the Resilience Framework Edition 1.0 at BCI World

November 1, 2024
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
An AI agent icon lying on its side with eyes shut showing the concept of a deactivated agent.

New report reveals major operational resilience gaps in agentic AI adoption

Two hands form a rectangular frame around the sun in a bright sky over distant mountains.

BCI Future of Resilience Report points to a more strategic future for resilience

Global risks concept

UN report warns that the global risk landscape is being redrawn

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?