Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Risk»Threatscape»Traditional vulnerability patching models are breaking down: a new approach is urgently needed (Page 14)
Threatscape

Traditional vulnerability patching models are breaking down: a new approach is urgently needed

August 19, 20263 Mins Read
A warning icon on a technical honeycomb pattern background,

Rapid7, Inc. has released its Quarterly Threat Landscape Report, highlighting that rising vulnerability volumes and faster weaponisation are breaking traditional patching models. The findings reinforce that security teams must move beyond static severity scores and prioritise the exposures that attackers can realistically exploit.

As AI accelerates flaw discovery, the critical challenge for defenders is no longer just finding bugs – it is acting before adversaries do. According to the report, high and critical disclosures doubled year over year to 8,539, with newly exploited vulnerabilities jumping by up to 40%. With the window between disclosure and active exploit shrinking rapidly, relying on static CVSS scores and periodic patching is no longer viable.

“Security teams are chasing ghosts if they think they’re ‘secure’ just by closing tickets based on CVSS scores. We’re drowning in a deluge of disclosures, and the gap between a patch existing and an exploit being weaponised has collapsed to near zero,” said Christiaan Beek, Vice President, Rapid7 Labs. “If you’re still relying on periodic patch cycles while your adversary is automating their kill chain, you aren’t managing risk, you’re just subsidising the attackers’ R&D. Stop collecting CVEs and start focusing on the exposures that actually matter.”

Key findings from the report include:

Zero-click vulnerabilities increased
62% of newly exploited vulnerabilities were ‘holy grail’ flaws that could be exploited over a network without authentication or user interaction.

Weaponisation signals accelerated
The volume of critical vulnerabilities increased 21% quarter over quarter, while publicly available proof-of-concept code rose 12% from the previous quarter and 76% year over year, expanding the pool of vulnerabilities attackers can quickly turn into real-world attacks.

Missing authentication created a growing attack surface
Disclosures involving missing authentication increased 247% year over year, from 45 to 156.

Ransomware remained concentrated but continued expanding geographically
The United States accounted for 881 listed ransomware victims, approximately nine times the 99 recorded in Germany. India and Thailand also entered the quarter’s top ten countries, indicating that ransomware affiliate programmes are extending beyond their historically prominent US and European targets.

What this means for security operations

The second quarter of 2026 makes clear that the traditional wait-and-see patch cycle is no longer enough. With vulnerability disclosures surging and attackers increasingly automating discovery, security teams need to focus less on chasing every new flaw and more on reducing exposure that is actually reachable and exploitable. That shift towards evidence-based exposure management is at the heart of a pre-emptive security approach.

Obtain the report
Africa Asia Asia Pacific Australasia Europe Middle East North America UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleThe 2027 DRI Awards are now open for nominations
Next Article Strengthening supply chain resilience: how business continuity professionals can support procurement teams

Related Posts

A group of rabbits happily graze while a wolf watches, hidden in the bushes behind them.

Confidence in resilience is outpacing reality, according to new report

November 13, 2026
An upward trending arrow.

Organizations are being forced to rethink resilience strategies, finds State of IT Infrastructure Resilience study

November 13, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
The numbers 2027 with the 0 replaced with an AI symbol.

From hype to control: AI security, risk management, and governance in 2027

November 13, 2026
Geopolitical risks

Geopolitical conflict is increasingly reshaping how organizations manage people, operations, and risk

November 9, 2026
Abstract network of interconnected nodes and lines in blue.

Everbridge publishes its 2027 Global Risk & Resilience Outlook

November 9, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
AI agent in action concept.

Lack of clear activity baselines makes it harder to manage AI agent resilience and security

November 9, 2026
Two different jigsaw pieces.

KPMG Risk & Resilience Survey finds that half of organizations have yet to integrate risk and resilience management

March 12, 2025
A swirl of sand around a rock to show the concept of flexibility.

Organizational flexibility:  developing and managing the ability to be flexible

July 2, 2026
Latest resources
Mature businessman smiling talking on smartphone drinking coffee.

A hidden dependency: when trust becomes a vulnerability

June 2, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
An AI agent icon lying on its side with eyes shut showing the concept of a deactivated agent.

New report reveals major operational resilience gaps in agentic AI adoption

Two hands form a rectangular frame around the sun in a bright sky over distant mountains.

BCI Future of Resilience Report points to a more strategic future for resilience

Global risks concept

UN report warns that the global risk landscape is being redrawn

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?