Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Cyber resilience»The UK’s new AI Cyber Security Code of Practice: why using ISO 42001 alongside it brings advantages (Page 13)
Cyber resilience

The UK’s new AI Cyber Security Code of Practice: why using ISO 42001 alongside it brings advantages

In January 2025, the UK Government released its new AI Cyber Security Code of Practice. In this article Sam Peters overviews the resilience benefits of this and explains why implementing it alongside the existing ISO 42001 AI management system standard brings benefits.
April 15, 20255 Mins Read
Two puzzle pieces on a divided white and blue background.

According to the World Economic Forum (WEF)’s Global Risks Report 2025, “adverse outcomes from AI technologies” was ranked as the sixth most severe risk over the next decade by business leaders and experts. Therefore, organizations must focus on designing their AI infrastructure and systems with security in mind to avoid these adverse outcomes and make the most of AI without cybercriminal-centric side effects.

In this context, it is encouraging to see the UK Government signalling ambition to prioritise security within the AI ecosystem via the introduction of a new AI Cyber Security Code of Practice.

Designed to guide developers, operators, and stakeholders in securely managing AI systems, the code of practice is divided into 13 core principles that cover every stage of the AI lifecycle, from design to deployment, maintenance, and end-of-life.

Among these, the Government has highlighted the need to “design your AI system for security as well as functionality and performance” in Principle 2. In addition, other key focus areas include enabling human responsibility for AI systems (Principle 4); securing your supply chain (Principle 7); documenting data, models and prompts (Principle 8); maintaining regular security updates and patches (Principle 11); and ensuring proper data and model disposal (Principle 13).

This code of practice doesn’t just apply to software vendors offering AI services to customers. It applies to any UK-based organization developing its own AI systems for in-house use, as well as any company using third-party AI components.

That breadth of application is important. Ultimately, the AI Cyber Security Code of Practice is about futureproofing. By building AI security and safeguards now, organizations will be better placed to prevent major problems down the road while still reaping the benefits of AI implementation, from greater productivity to improved decision-making.

In the UK NCSC’s own words, these principles in the Code of Practice are designed to “not only help enhance the resilience of AI systems against malicious attacks but foster an environment in which UK AI innovation can thrive”.

Of course, building resilience will be an ongoing journey rather than a destination, with cybercriminals evolving and adapting their techniques and targets all the time. However, already we have seen a variety of ways in which AI systems can be exploited if they are not designed securely.

Prompt injection attacks, for example, can enable malicious actors to bypass built-in safety guardrails to abuse large language models (LLMs) for nefarious means, and the dark web is reportedly already awash with ‘jailbreak-as-a-service’ offerings. Equally, misconfigurations in AI system components may be leveraged by threat actors seeking to steal or ‘poison’ sensitive training data or models. Such security holes have been discovered in vector databases, open-source components and LLM-hosting platforms.

These two avenues represent just a drop in a much broader ocean of potential threats to AI systems. If not managed correctly, these technologies can expand attack surfaces exponentially, increasing organizations’ risk of succumbing to attacks as they are increasingly embedded into key processes and applications.

That is why the AI Cyber Security Code of Practice is so crucial. If organizations are looking to ramp up their adoption of AI systems, then it is vital that they have the guidance and tools available to improve security, increase cyber resilience, and combat threat actors growing efforts to exploit malicious opportunities.

How ISO 42001 can help businesses adhere to the code of practice

Unlike the EU’s more prescriptive EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice, the UK’s principles-based model applies technology-neutral regulations to AI – a reflection of the UK Government’s view that while regulating AI is necessary, acting prematurely may do more harm than good.

As a result, the terms of the AI Cyber Security Code of Practice remain somewhat open to interpretation and are likely to be refined moving forward. However, for businesses that are looking to get ahead, the good news is that there are already best practice frameworks and standards that AI developers and users can align with.

Enter ISO 42001 – a standard published in 2023 that has been specifically designed to help drive the responsible use and management of AI. With the goal of aiding organizations in establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving an AI management system, it provides guidelines on secure AI use, helping developers implement mechanisms to detect unusual behaviour or unexpected outputs, reducing susceptibility to manipulation.

In essence, ISO 42001 is an effective methodology for helping organizations to adopt AI mindfully. It advocates due diligence and caution, ensuring that there is sufficient insight and oversight of any risks associated with AI system development. And perhaps more importantly, the clauses and controls within ISO 42001 can be mapped to all the principles within the AI Cyber Security Code of Practice.

As the Code of Practice matures and evolves, it could become the de facto baseline for AI security. But for now, organizations can look towards ISO 42001 as a framework for best practice, guiding firms in managing and mitigating AI-specific security and operational risks, and enhancing the overall security posture of AI.

The author

Sam Peters, is Chief Product Officer of ISMS.online

UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleAuthentrics.ai launches AI Machine-Learning Resilience Infrastructure solution
Next Article Beyond the deadline: the FCA sets out what’s next for UK operational resilience regulation

Related Posts

An exploding digital padlock illustrates the requirement for post-quantum cryptography.

Research breakthrough brings reliable quantum computers and Q-day closer to reality

September 10, 2026
A danger sign on a digital background.

New blob URL phishing technique evades detection by using legitimate Microsoft services

September 10, 2026
AI risks

Unmanaged AI workflows expose EMEA organizations to rising compliance and data risks

September 9, 2026
City skyline at sunset with bright light trails and a translucent blue smart-city grid overlay and GPS pins indicating locations.

AI world models: future possibilities for organizational resilience?

September 7, 2026
DRJ and BCI logos

DRJ and BCI publish guidance for governing, managing, and using AI in resilience

September 7, 2026
Decision making with over whelming information.

AI can find the vulnerability. Accountability still sits with your crisis leadership

September 7, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
Under pressure: An egg cracking under pressure applied by squeezing clamps form the sides.

Managing scenario testing for operational resilience

May 16, 2024
COSO logo

New COSO ERM guidance aims to help organizations with practical implementation

May 12, 2026
Close-up of a green-brown iris peering through a jagged tear in dark paper or wall material.

The blind spots in business continuity

September 2, 2026
Latest resources
Corporate Governance Guiding Principles for Board Oversight cover

COSO releases guidance for board risk management and internal control oversight

April 8, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
A futuristic red warning alert icon with glowing exclamation mark.

Cloud Security Alliance publishes Hugging Face Incident Initial Post-Mortem

A person hold a building door open for a person behind who is tailgating to get unauthorised access.

Security Culture: A Strategic Capability That Builds Resilience in a Volatile World

An identity icon with a map marker on it, indicating the concept of identity as a target for attackers. The icon is on a generic IT background predominantly in black and orange.

Identity-based approaches dominate initial access for ransomware attacks

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?