Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Managing resilience»Supply chain resilience»The majority of companies have made supply chain changes to improve resilience, agility, and flexibility (Page 57)
Supply chain resilience

The majority of companies have made supply chain changes to improve resilience, agility, and flexibility

August 20, 20243 Mins Read
Concept image showing the global supply chain.

73% of companies have adjusted their supply chains in the past two years, adding or removing production locations from their supply chain networks, according to a recent survey by Gartner. These changes have been driven by chief supply chain officers’ (CSCOs) emphasis on building resilience, agility, and flexibility into their supply chains, rather than prioritizing the lowest-cost strategies.

To understand how CSCOs are currently approaching supply chain design and strategy, Gartner surveyed 437 respondents from April to May 2024, which included senior managers and above from companies with annual revenues of at least $250 million across North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia/Pacific. The data showed that “risk management considerations, such as improving resilience, in addition to enhancing flexibility, and agility, have displaced cost-efficiency as the top drivers of network changes.”

The top factors driving changes to the supply chain network in the last two years were:

  • Increase resilience / redundancy as part of risk management strategy: 46%
  • Improving agility or flexibility: 43%
  • Reducing operational expenses and being cost-efficient: 41%
  • Meeting sustainability objectives or targets: 38%
  • Simplify / streamline supply chain network: 36%

The most frequently cited changes to supply chain networks were:

  • Half of respondents cited adding new supply locations with existing supply partners,
  • 48% cited pursuing new supply locations with new supply partners.

The addition of supply locations is a strategy companies often deploy to serve multiple purposes, including diversification, achieving cost-efficiencies, mitigating geopolitical pressures, and improving efficiency.

Among organizations that have made supply chain network changes in the past two years, 90% reported that they have met or exceeded the expected benefits of the change. These benefits include improved service, cost reduction, enhanced agility, and reduced carbon emissions. This success rate indicates more changes are likely to come, as supply chain leaders pursue a ‘reglobalization’ strategy that incorporates a mix of nearshoring and low-cost diversification.

However, despite the early success of these network shifts, 96% of respondents cited challenges with operating in new locations. While operational and logistics costs were most often cited in the aggregate, there were important regional differences emphasized by supply chain leaders, including:

  • For new capacity added in India, inadequate logistics infrastructure was more of a challenge than logistics costs.
  • In North America, a shortage of factory workers is a more common challenge compared to all other regions.
  • Complexity in complying with local regulations in South Asia, Africa, and Central and South America was cited at higher rates than other regions.

These regional differences underline the importance of making decisions on new locations based on a variety of factors and not just apparent cost-efficiency. A lack of factory workers or complexities in complying with local regulations often add further costs if not thoroughly considered and addressed before decisions are taken.

Gartner clients can read more in: Reglobalization Is Driving Supply Chain Performance. Nonclients can learn more in: Supply Chain Risk: Key Strategies for Success.

Africa Asia Asia Pacific Australasia Europe Middle East North America UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleNominations open for the 2025 DRI Awards of Excellence
Next Article Urban layout impacts flood resilience and intensity of flooding

Related Posts

A group of rabbits happily graze while a wolf watches, hidden in the bushes behind them.

Confidence in resilience is outpacing reality, according to new report

November 13, 2026
An upward trending arrow.

Organizations are being forced to rethink resilience strategies, finds State of IT Infrastructure Resilience study

November 13, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
The numbers 2027 with the 0 replaced with an AI symbol.

From hype to control: AI security, risk management, and governance in 2027

November 13, 2026
Geopolitical risks

Geopolitical conflict is increasingly reshaping how organizations manage people, operations, and risk

November 9, 2026
Abstract network of interconnected nodes and lines in blue.

Everbridge publishes its 2027 Global Risk & Resilience Outlook

November 9, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
AI agent in action concept.

Lack of clear activity baselines makes it harder to manage AI agent resilience and security

November 9, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
Two different jigsaw pieces.

KPMG Risk & Resilience Survey finds that half of organizations have yet to integrate risk and resilience management

March 12, 2025
Latest resources
Agentic AI concept.

Managing and testing the security of AI applications: how and where to start

February 13, 2025
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
An AI agent icon lying on its side with eyes shut showing the concept of a deactivated agent.

New report reveals major operational resilience gaps in agentic AI adoption

Two hands form a rectangular frame around the sun in a bright sky over distant mountains.

BCI Future of Resilience Report points to a more strategic future for resilience

Global risks concept

UN report warns that the global risk landscape is being redrawn

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?