Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Cyber resilience»The five layers of a systematic approach to cyber resilience (Page 49)
Cyber resilience

The five layers of a systematic approach to cyber resilience

Tom Leyden explains why businesses must shift from traditional cyber security controls to a layered systematic resilience model.
March 18, 20264 Mins Read
A five layered cube.

Despite geopolitical uncertainty, new AI-created cyber threats, and nation-state security risks, global businesses indicate that their budget outlook is woefully thin on cyber resilience spending to defend against these threats. The 2026 PwC Global Digital Trust Insights report calls resilience ‘a work in progress’ as only 6% of respondents to a survey for the report feel that their organization can withstand a wide range of attacks. The report also warns that spending is too skewed toward reactive measures like paying fines than proactive measures to support effective cyber resilience. Ideally, spending will reach a better balance. However, powerful cyber resilience does need to cover both before and after elements of security and data protection. Think of it as a complete system, one that assumes attacks will occur and focuses on fast, reliable recovery.

Taking a systematic approach to cyber resilience

Taking a systematic approach is the most effective means of fighting the new generation of automated and AI threats, ransomware being the prime example. Using modern tools, ransomware has evolved into a new, more dangerous version. IT and security professionals know there is no solitary product or control that can stop every one of these threats. Protection must therefore be designed as a complete system, providing a business with the a thorough defence and recovery infrastructure.

To achieve resilience, it is strategic to think of a cyber security infrastructure as having five layers working together to keep data protected, recoverable, and trustworthy even when other parts of the environment are compromised. Any organization, regardless of size or technology stack, can apply these same principles.

The five layers are:

Defence at the API origin
Gaining entry through management consoles or API is an alternative to accessing hardware and a favourite of attackers. Therefore, interfaces must be treated as critical security boundaries that deserve the same attention as firewalls or authentication systems. Recommended defence tactics include strong access control, fine-grained permissions, and strict retention and immutability policies. These will protect data from both external attackers and accidental, potentially damaging internal actions.

Data access control
Preserving the integrity and confidentiality of data, even when attackers succeed in breaching the network, must be a critical priority. To accomplish this, the data layer should always assume zero trust. Every user, device, or process requesting access must be verified. Additionally, the system must encrypt data in transit and at rest to prevent stolen data from being exploited. Real-time monitoring is also required to flag anomalies and suspicious activity. Along with audit trails, these practices strengthen a proactive defence.

Stored data protection
Hardening the storage layer is essential to business recovery in the event of a cyber attack. Using techniques like erasure coding and distributed integrity checks, data can be reconstructed even if disks, servers, or entire nodes fail. Another recommended practice is separating metadata from the stored data to thwart attackers trying to reassemble stolen information. This strategy helps ensure stored data will be recoverable even after a hardware failure or attack.

Multi-site data redundancy
Data redundancy is the best approach to ensuring business continuity and recovery in the event of a widespread outage, cyber attack, or natural disaster. As some locations come back online, locally stored data will help businesses recover faster. It is an essential safety net in an era in which businesses are more globally dispersed than ever.

Architecting for immutability
For true resilience, a business must look beyond tools and policies to how the overall system architecture protects data and supports recovery. The best secure architecture isolates failure domains so that an issue in one area doesn’t cascade across the environment. Add to this multi-site replication, hybrid-cloud deployment, and policy-based data placement to enable operations to continue if one region fails. Architecting for immutability also requires being able to adapt to new threats like AI ransomware and make system changes to maintain the highest level of protection.

A workable system for future threats

When only 6% of organizations feel very confident they can adequately respond to a wide range of threats, it is compelling proof that a system approach to resilience needs more adoption. Without architecting for the certain eventuality of an attack or outage, businesses remain highly vulnerable.

Defending against cyber threats can be efficiently managed by integrating the resilience layers into a simplified architecture. Unifying storage, backup, and security functions reduces risk while improving efficiency. The easier it is for administrators to apply consistent policies and verify results, the stronger the overall defence becomes.

The author

Tom Leyden is Vice President, Product Marketing, Scality

Africa Asia Asia Pacific Australasia Europe Middle East North America UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleCyber warfare threats are at a ‘global tipping point’
Next Article Google releases cloud threats intelligence report

Related Posts

A group of rabbits happily graze while a wolf watches, hidden in the bushes behind them.

Confidence in resilience is outpacing reality, according to new report

November 13, 2026
An upward trending arrow.

Organizations are being forced to rethink resilience strategies, finds State of IT Infrastructure Resilience study

November 13, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
The numbers 2027 with the 0 replaced with an AI symbol.

From hype to control: AI security, risk management, and governance in 2027

November 13, 2026
Geopolitical risks

Geopolitical conflict is increasingly reshaping how organizations manage people, operations, and risk

November 9, 2026
Abstract network of interconnected nodes and lines in blue.

Everbridge publishes its 2027 Global Risk & Resilience Outlook

November 9, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
AI agent in action concept.

Lack of clear activity baselines makes it harder to manage AI agent resilience and security

November 9, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
Two different jigsaw pieces.

KPMG Risk & Resilience Survey finds that half of organizations have yet to integrate risk and resilience management

March 12, 2025
Latest resources
The DRMM

The Data Resilience Maturity Model – a new strategic framework to help organizations improve their data resilience

April 23, 2025
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
An AI agent icon lying on its side with eyes shut showing the concept of a deactivated agent.

New report reveals major operational resilience gaps in agentic AI adoption

Two hands form a rectangular frame around the sun in a bright sky over distant mountains.

BCI Future of Resilience Report points to a more strategic future for resilience

Global risks concept

UN report warns that the global risk landscape is being redrawn

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?