Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Cyber resilience»Report shows huge discrepancy between target RTOs and real-world experiences during ransomware attacks (Page 58)
Cyber resilience

Report shows huge discrepancy between target RTOs and real-world experiences during ransomware attacks

August 16, 20243 Mins Read
A group of darts all miss the target.

The recently published Cohesity Global Cyber Resilience Report 2024 has found that despite 98% of organizations having a recovery time objective (RTO) of less than 24 hours, only 2% of organizations can achieve this after a ransomware incident.

According to over 3000 respondents to a survey conducted for the report:

  • Only 2% said they could recover data and restore business processes within 24 hours of a successful ransomware attack.
  • 18% said their company could recover data and restore business processes within 1-3 days.
  • 32% said they could recover and restore in 4 to 6 days, while 31% would need 1-2 weeks.
  • Almost 1 in 6 (16%) need over three weeks to recover data and restore business processes.

Despite this chasm between business continuity planning and the reality of ransomware attacks, 78% of survey respondents stated that they have confidence in their company’s cyber resilience strategy: a strange dichotomy.

Ransomware attackers are winning: the majority of organizations pay out

The survey found that only 6% of respondents said their company would not pay a ransom to recover data and restore business processes, or do so faster, with 83% saying they would. In fact, 75% of respondents globally said their company would be willing to pay over US$1 million in ransoms to recover data and restore business processes, and over 1 in 5 (22%) said their company would be willing to pay over US$5 million.

Concerningly, close to 7 in 10 (69%) respondents said their organization had paid a ransom in the last year, before being surveyed, despite 77% saying their company had a ‘do not pay’ policy. The more than 2100 respondents, who have paid a ransom, said they had paid out the following amounts in the past year:

  • 37% have paid ransom(s) between US$1 – US$249,999
  • 23% have paid ransom(s) between US$250,000 – US$499,999
  • 23% have paid ransom(s) between US$500,000 – US$999,999
  • 12% have paid ransom(s) between US$1,000,000 – US$2,999,999
  • 6% have paid ransom(s) between US$3,000,000 – US$9,999,999
  • 0.33% (7 respondents) have paid ransom(s) between US$10,000,000 – US$25,000,000.

Demographics

The findings are based on a survey of 3139 IT and security decision-makers (split as close to 50:50 as possible) commissioned by Cohesity and conducted by Censuswide in June and July 2024. The top five industries that respondents selected as best representing their company’s operations were IT & telecommunications, manufacturing, financial services (incl. insurance), banking & wealth management, and hospitals & healthcare. Respondents came from Australia, France, Germany, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Obtain the report
Asia Pacific Europe North America UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleExploring the Covid-19 Inquiry’s ‘new approach’ to whole-system preparedness and resilience
Next Article Nominations open for the 2025 DRI Awards of Excellence

Related Posts

A group of rabbits happily graze while a wolf watches, hidden in the bushes behind them.

Confidence in resilience is outpacing reality, according to new report

November 13, 2026
An upward trending arrow.

Organizations are being forced to rethink resilience strategies, finds State of IT Infrastructure Resilience study

November 13, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
The numbers 2027 with the 0 replaced with an AI symbol.

From hype to control: AI security, risk management, and governance in 2027

November 13, 2026
Geopolitical risks

Geopolitical conflict is increasingly reshaping how organizations manage people, operations, and risk

November 9, 2026
Abstract network of interconnected nodes and lines in blue.

Everbridge publishes its 2027 Global Risk & Resilience Outlook

November 9, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
AI agent in action concept.

Lack of clear activity baselines makes it harder to manage AI agent resilience and security

November 9, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
Two different jigsaw pieces.

KPMG Risk & Resilience Survey finds that half of organizations have yet to integrate risk and resilience management

March 12, 2025
Latest resources
A Dynamic Heartbeat Visualization with Vivid Colours

Resilience Pulse Check: Harnessing Collaboration to Navigate a Volatile World

February 5, 2025
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
An AI agent icon lying on its side with eyes shut showing the concept of a deactivated agent.

New report reveals major operational resilience gaps in agentic AI adoption

Two hands form a rectangular frame around the sun in a bright sky over distant mountains.

BCI Future of Resilience Report points to a more strategic future for resilience

Global risks concept

UN report warns that the global risk landscape is being redrawn

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?