Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Managing resilience»C-suite and the board»Privacy needs to be governed and managed as a resilience requirement (Page 18)
C-suite and the board

Privacy needs to be governed and managed as a resilience requirement

January 16, 20264 Mins Read
A privacy icon overlaying a digital background concept.

Privacy teams are being asked to manage growing risk with fewer resources, according to new research from ISACA. Despite accelerating privacy threats and regulatory demands, more than four in ten (44%) privacy professionals in Europe say their teams are underfunded, while over half (54%) expect privacy budgets to decrease further in 2026.

In a region with one of the world’s most mature privacy regulatory environments, underinvestment is already having tangible consequences. Nearly four in ten (39%) legal privacy roles and over half (51%) of technical privacy roles in Europe report being understaffed, and more than a quarter (26%) of privacy professionals believe their organization is likely to experience a material privacy breach within the next year.

Together, this highlights a growing contradiction for European organizations: privacy risk and regulatory expectations continue to rise, while investment in people and resources is being scaled back.

Yet board-level attention remains inconsistent. More than a quarter (26%) of European respondents say their board of directors is failing to adequately prioritise privacy, even as risks continue to intensify.

Chris Dimitriadis, Global Chief Strategy Officer at ISACA, said, “Privacy teams are being asked to manage more risk with fewer resources, and the strain is beginning to show. As organizations adopt new technologies at speed, the volume and complexity of privacy obligations grow in parallel – yet many teams are still operating without the staffing, funding, or training they need to keep pace.

“When boards underestimate privacy, they underestimate a fundamental pillar of digital trust. A single privacy breach can erode years of brand equity, damage customer relationships and trigger significant regulatory consequences. Prioritising privacy is not simply a compliance requirement; it is a business imperative.”

These pressures are mounting at a time when risks are accelerating.

Nearly half (49%) of professionals say managing the risks associated with new technologies is a major obstacle to their privacy programmes. The human impact is equally stark: 67% say their job is more stressful now than five years ago, with respondents pointing to the rapid pace of technological change (68%) and compliance challenges (64%) as key drivers.

Regulatory complexity is compounding these challenges. Over a fifth (22%) of privacy professionals in Europe say their organization struggles to identify and understand its privacy obligations, while more than half (51%) point to the complexity of international laws and regulations as a key barrier. Confidence in future readiness is low, with just 8% of respondents completely confident in their organization’s ability to comply with new and emerging privacy laws.

While regulation is helping to elevate privacy discussions at board level – with 44% of professionals saying their board views the privacy programme as compliance-driven – a narrow focus on compliance alone leaves organizations exposed. True resilience requires boards to see privacy as a strategic and ethical priority.

Dimitriadis continues: “These gaps underline a critical truth: privacy cannot be strengthened solely through controls or checklists, even with the help of AI. It demands sustained investment in people, governance, and culture – and that begins at the top.

“Boards must treat privacy as a strategic driver of trust, resilience, and competitive advantage, not just a compliance checkbox. When organizations equip their privacy teams with the skills, resources, and authority they need, they are not just reducing risk – they are preparing their business for the next wave of regulatory and technological change. By investing in training and professional development today, leaders can build a foundation of privacy resilience that is ready for the evolving landscape.”

Many organizations are taking positive steps, with 79% in Europe using a framework or regulation, most commonly GDPR, to guide their privacy programme, and a majority implementing controls such as data security (71%) and encryption (73%).

However, critical gaps remain. Only 64% of European organizations have a formal incident response plan as part of their privacy controls, leaving more than a third unprepared to respond effectively to privacy incidents. Retention is also a growing concern, with 34% reporting difficulty keeping qualified privacy professionals, and 45% citing a lack of training or poor training as a key contributor to privacy failures.

Europe UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleGartner identifies workforce resilience trends
Next Article UK and EU regulators sign memorandum of understanding for oversight of critical third parties

Related Posts

An exploding digital padlock illustrates the requirement for post-quantum cryptography.

Research breakthrough brings reliable quantum computers and Q-day closer to reality

September 10, 2026
A danger sign on a digital background.

New blob URL phishing technique evades detection by using legitimate Microsoft services

September 10, 2026
AI risks

Unmanaged AI workflows expose EMEA organizations to rising compliance and data risks

September 9, 2026
City skyline at sunset with bright light trails and a translucent blue smart-city grid overlay and GPS pins indicating locations.

AI world models: future possibilities for organizational resilience?

September 7, 2026
DRJ and BCI logos

DRJ and BCI publish guidance for governing, managing, and using AI in resilience

September 7, 2026
Decision making with over whelming information.

AI can find the vulnerability. Accountability still sits with your crisis leadership

September 7, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
Under pressure: An egg cracking under pressure applied by squeezing clamps form the sides.

Managing scenario testing for operational resilience

May 16, 2024
COSO logo

New COSO ERM guidance aims to help organizations with practical implementation

May 12, 2026
Close-up of a green-brown iris peering through a jagged tear in dark paper or wall material.

The blind spots in business continuity

September 2, 2026
Latest resources
A hand completing a block puzzle with the word Resilience in the middle. The missing piece being added is an icon of chess pieces indicating strategic resilience governance.

Resilience governance: why do board members have a duty to consider resilience?

January 5, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
A futuristic red warning alert icon with glowing exclamation mark.

Cloud Security Alliance publishes Hugging Face Incident Initial Post-Mortem

A person hold a building door open for a person behind who is tailgating to get unauthorised access.

Security Culture: A Strategic Capability That Builds Resilience in a Volatile World

An identity icon with a map marker on it, indicating the concept of identity as a target for attackers. The icon is on a generic IT background predominantly in black and orange.

Identity-based approaches dominate initial access for ransomware attacks

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?