Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Managing resilience»Organizational resilience»Developing an effective resilience policy: guidance for c-level executives and boards (Page 6)
Organizational resilience

Developing an effective resilience policy: guidance for c-level executives and boards

May 2, 20256 Mins Read
A businesswomen checking on digital documents. She is checking steps in a policy.

ISO 22336, the new standard that was released in 2024 and which covers the strategic elements of managing and directing organizational resilience, states that an organization’s top management should develop a resilience policy which sets the parameters for embedding resilience objectives into organizational strategies.

This Resilience Forward article looks at this area and the steps that top management needs to take to comply with the ISO 22336 guidelines.

For c-level executives and boards, crafting a robust resilience policy is not merely a compliance exercise; it is a strategic imperative that aligns organizational purpose, culture, and strategy to deliver real organizational value.

What does ISO 22336 require?

ISO 22336 states that an organization looking to be in alignment with the standard should establish a resilience policy that aligns the organization’s values and behaviours with a shared vision and purpose. Such a policy aims to encourage a shared understanding of the organization’s vision and purpose among all interested parties and leverage positive elements of its culture during the design and implementation of the strategy.

The resilience policy should document the organization’s intention to enhance its resilience. It articulates the organization’s commitment to resilience, sets parameters for resilience objectives, guides strategy, and provides a framework for embedding resilience into decision-making. Crucially, the resilience policy also assigns accountability for delivery of the resilience strategy.

For executives and boards, the policy is a formal commitment to organizational resilience, signalling an understanding of the need for top management governance, oversight, and appropriate funding in this area.

What should c-level executives and boards consider when developing a resilience policy? Here are some important areas to think about:

Establish leadership commitment

ISO 22336 emphasizes that top management must own and drive the resilience policy. This starts with explicit leadership commitment:

  • The CEO and board chair should publicly endorse resilience as a strategic priority.
  • A resilience sponsor or champion should be appointed at the executive level to oversee policy development.
  • Resilience should be integrated into board-level discussions, alongside financial, operational, and compliance reviews.

Leadership commitment ensures that resilience is not relegated to operational silos but becomes an enterprise-wide imperative.

Align with organizational values, vision, and culture

A resilience policy should not be a generic statement; it must reflect the organization’s unique values, culture, vision, and purpose. Boards and executives should ask:

  • How does resilience align with our mission and long-term goals?
  • What aspects of our culture can we leverage to strengthen resilience?
  • How do we balance agility and control without stifling innovation?

This alignment encourages a shared understanding of resilience across stakeholders and fosters behaviours that reinforce, rather than undermine, resilience objectives.

Define policy scope and boundaries

Executives should define what the policy covers. Will it apply enterprise-wide, or focus on critical business units, supply chains, or operations? Does it address all types of risks (strategic, operational, financial, reputational), or prioritize specific threat categories?

Defining scope helps set clear expectations for where resilience efforts will be prioritised and ensures resources are allocated accordingly.

Establish resilience objectives

ISO 22336 advises that the policy should set parameters for embedding resilience objectives into strategy. Objectives should be:

  • Aligned with organizational goals: supporting not only survival but strategic growth.
  • SMART (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound): to enable effective monitoring and accountability.
  • Comprehensive: addressing anticipation, prevention, response, adaptation, and recovery.

Executives should involve risk, operations, IT, HR, legal, and other functions in defining objectives to ensure they reflect enterprise realities.

Assign accountability and governance

A critical aspect of the resilience policy is defining accountability for resilience outcomes:

  • Who is responsible for implementing the resilience strategy?
  • How will accountability be cascaded through the organization?
  • What governance structures (committees, reporting lines, oversight mechanisms) will ensure policy adherence?

Clear accountability prevents resilience from becoming a vague aspiration and ensures operationalisation.

Integrate with broader strategies and policies

A resilience policy should not exist in isolation. Executives must ensure that it integrates with:

  • Enterprise risk management (ERM) frameworks
  • Operational resilience, business continuity, disaster recovery, and crisis management plans
  • Sustainability and ESG strategies
  • Corporate governance policies
  • Other areas as appropriate to the organization.

Integration avoids duplication, leverages synergies, and embeds resilience across organizational systems.

Engage stakeholders and build awareness

An effective resilience policy requires buy-in from stakeholders at all levels:

  • Internally: employees, management teams, unions
  • Externally: suppliers, customers, regulators, investors.

Executives should lead awareness campaigns, communicate the policy’s intent and benefits, and foster an environment where feedback and improvement are encouraged.

Include continuous improvement mechanisms

Resilience is not static. The policy should embed mechanisms for review, evaluation, and continuous improvement, including:

  • Regular audits and assessments of resilience capabilities
  • Feedback loops from crisis events, exercises, and simulations
  • Clear triggers for policy revision based on changing risks or organizational shifts.

Executives must commit to periodic policy reviews to maintain relevance and effectiveness.

Formalise and communicate the policy

Once developed, the policy should be documented, approved at the board level, and formally communicated. Key actions include:

  • Including the policy in governance documents
  • Communicating it through CEO messages, company meetings / town halls, and leadership briefings
  • Ensuring it is easily accessible and understandable to all stakeholders.

Formal communication reinforces the policy’s authority and supports its adoption.

Board oversight role

Boards have a fiduciary duty to oversee resilience as part of enterprise risk and governance. Key board actions include:

  • Approving the resilience policy and ensuring alignment with strategic objectives
  • Monitoring policy implementation and resilience metrics
  • Challenging management’s assumptions about resilience activities.

Active board oversight ensures that resilience remains a strategic priority rather than a compliance checkbox.

Conclusion

A well-crafted resilience policy is a foundational tool for embedding resilience into the DNA of an organization. For c-level executives and boards, it is a mechanism to align culture, strategy, and governance toward a shared vision of sustainable, adaptive, and proactive resilience.

By taking ownership of the policy development process, aligning it with organizational values, assigning clear accountability, and integrating it across strategies, leadership can position the organization not only to survive disruptions but to prosper during and after disruption. This is, after all, the stated aim of resilience activities, according to ISO 22316, the parent standard for ISO 22336. ISO 22316 defines organizational resilience as the ability of an organization to absorb and adapt in a changing environment to enable it to deliver its objectives and to survive and prosper.  This is the goal of resilience: and is something that the resilience policy needs to encapsulate.

Finally, developing a resilience policy is not a one-size-fits-all task. A phased approach may be prudent, starting with core operations and expanding policy coverage over time.

The author

David Honour is editor of Resilience Forward.

Using a ‘critical friend’ to help improve your resilience policy…

When developing resilience policies an external ‘critical friend’ can be very helpful.  A critical friend isn’t embedded in the organization’s internal politics or culture, so they can challenge assumptions, question biases, and highlight blind spots that insiders might overlook. This can help to improve policies and ensure that they don’t miss important areas.

As an organizational resilience subject matter expert with board level experience, David Honour can act as a critical friend when it comes to the development of resilience policies. Contact him to discuss this further.

Africa Asia Asia Pacific Australasia Europe Middle East North America UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleAbsolute Security launches the 2025 Resilience Index and highlights the need for ‘extreme resilience’
Next Article Four interconnected megatrends are leading the current threatscape

Related Posts

An exploding digital padlock illustrates the requirement for post-quantum cryptography.

Research breakthrough brings reliable quantum computers and Q-day closer to reality

September 10, 2026
A danger sign on a digital background.

New blob URL phishing technique evades detection by using legitimate Microsoft services

September 10, 2026
AI risks

Unmanaged AI workflows expose EMEA organizations to rising compliance and data risks

September 9, 2026
City skyline at sunset with bright light trails and a translucent blue smart-city grid overlay and GPS pins indicating locations.

AI world models: future possibilities for organizational resilience?

September 7, 2026
DRJ and BCI logos

DRJ and BCI publish guidance for governing, managing, and using AI in resilience

September 7, 2026
Decision making with over whelming information.

AI can find the vulnerability. Accountability still sits with your crisis leadership

September 7, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
Under pressure: An egg cracking under pressure applied by squeezing clamps form the sides.

Managing scenario testing for operational resilience

May 16, 2024
COSO logo

New COSO ERM guidance aims to help organizations with practical implementation

May 12, 2026
Close-up of a green-brown iris peering through a jagged tear in dark paper or wall material.

The blind spots in business continuity

September 2, 2026
Latest resources
Graphic showing a range of risks from green to red grades.

2026 update to the UK National Risk Register published

July 15, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
A futuristic red warning alert icon with glowing exclamation mark.

Cloud Security Alliance publishes Hugging Face Incident Initial Post-Mortem

A person hold a building door open for a person behind who is tailgating to get unauthorised access.

Security Culture: A Strategic Capability That Builds Resilience in a Volatile World

An identity icon with a map marker on it, indicating the concept of identity as a target for attackers. The icon is on a generic IT background predominantly in black and orange.

Identity-based approaches dominate initial access for ransomware attacks

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?