Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Risk»Threatscape»AI future risks: our ability to produce intelligent software ‘far outstrips’ our ability to control it (Page 15)
Threatscape

AI future risks: our ability to produce intelligent software ‘far outstrips’ our ability to control it

February 14, 20245 Mins Read
A human eye overlaid with technology details shows that concept of future AI risks.

Despite the recognition that the problem of AI control may be one of the most important problems facing humanity, it remains poorly understood, poorly defined, and poorly researched says Dr Roman V. Yampolskiy in his upcoming book, AI: Unexplainable, Unpredictable, Uncontrollable.

In the book, AI Safety expert Dr Yampolskiy looks at the ways that AI has the potential to dramatically reshape society, not always to our advantage. He explains: “We are facing an almost guaranteed event with potential to cause an existential catastrophe. No wonder many consider this to be the most important problem humanity has ever faced. The outcome could be prosperity or extinction, and the fate of the universe hangs in the balance.”

The risks of uncontrollable superintelligence

Dr Yampolskiy has carried out an extensive review of AI scientific literature and states he has found no proof that AI can be safely controlled – and even if there are some partial controls, they would not be enough.

He explains: “Why do so many researchers assume that AI control problem is solvable? To the best of our knowledge, there is no evidence for that, no proof. Before embarking on a quest to build a controlled AI, it is important to show that the problem is solvable. This, combined with statistics that show the development of AI superintelligence is an almost guaranteed event, show we should be supporting a significant AI safety effort.”

He argues that our ability to produce intelligent software far outstrips our ability to control or even verify it. After a comprehensive literature review, he suggests advanced intelligent systems can never be fully controllable and so will always present certain level of risk regardless of benefit they provide. He believes it should be the goal of the AI community to minimize such risk while maximizing potential benefit.

AI (and superintelligence), differ from other programs by its ability to learn new behaviors, adjust its performance and act semi-autonomously in novel situations. One issue with making AI ‘safe’ is that the possible decisions and failures by a superintelligent being as it becomes more capable is infinite, so there are an infinite number of safety issues.

At the same time, Yampolskiy explains, AI cannot explain what it has decided, and/or we cannot understand the explanation given as humans are not smart enough to understand the concepts implemented. If we do not understand AI’s decisions and we only have a ‘black box’, we cannot understand the problem and reduce likelihood of future accidents.

Minimizing the future AI risk

To minimize the risk of AI, Yampolskiy says it needs it to be modifiable with ‘undo’ options, limitable, transparent and easy to understand in human language.

He suggests that all AI should be categorised as controllable or uncontrollable, and nothing should be taken off the table. Limited moratoriums, and even partial bans on certain types of AI technology should be considered.

Instead of being discouraged, he says: “Rather it is a reason, for more people, to dig deeper and to increase effort, and funding for AI Safety and Security research. We may not ever get to 100% safe AI, but we can make AI safer in proportion to our efforts, which is a lot better than doing nothing. We need to use this opportunity wisely.”

More details

Resilience Forward comment

We thought it would be interesting to ask an AI system itself for ideas on the best ways to stop artificial intelligence from leaving human control. This was Chat GPT’s response:

Preventing artificial intelligence (AI) from leaving human control is a complex challenge that requires a multi-faceted approach involving technical, ethical, and regulatory measures. Here are some strategies that can help mitigate the risks associated with AI systems becoming uncontrollable:

  1. Robust Governance and Regulation: Governments and international bodies can establish comprehensive regulatory frameworks to govern the development, deployment, and use of AI systems. These regulations can include guidelines for transparency, accountability, safety, and adherence to ethical principles.
  2. Ethical Design and Development Practices: AI developers should prioritize ethical considerations throughout the entire lifecycle of AI systems. This includes designing AI systems with built-in safety mechanisms, adhering to ethical guidelines such as fairness, transparency, and accountability, and conducting thorough risk assessments during development.
  3. Human Oversight and Control: Maintaining human oversight and control over AI systems is crucial. Developers should design AI systems in a way that ensures humans can intervene, monitor, and override automated decisions when necessary. This may involve implementing mechanisms such as kill switches, human-in-the-loop systems, and decision explanation capabilities.
  4. Transparency and Explainability: AI systems should be transparent and explainable to enable humans to understand their behavior and decision-making processes. This enhances accountability and helps identify and address potential issues before they escalate beyond human control.
  5. Continuous Monitoring and Evaluation: Implementing robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms can help detect anomalies, biases, or unintended consequences in AI systems. Regular audits, testing, and feedback loops are essential for identifying and addressing emerging risks.
  6. Education and Awareness: Educating policymakers, developers, and the general public about the risks associated with AI and the importance of responsible AI development and use can help foster a culture of accountability and responsible innovation.
  7. International Collaboration: Given the global nature of AI development and deployment, international collaboration is essential to develop consistent standards, share best practices, and address common challenges related to AI safety and control.
  8. Research and Development: Investing in research and development aimed at advancing AI safety techniques, such as robustness, verifiability, and alignment with human values, is critical for developing AI systems that remain under human control.

While these strategies can help mitigate the risks associated with AI systems leaving human control, it’s essential to recognize that achieving complete control may be challenging due to the inherent complexity and unpredictability of AI systems. Therefore, ongoing vigilance and adaptation of strategies are necessary to address emerging risks and ensure that AI continues to serve humanity’s best interests.

    Africa Asia Asia Pacific Australasia Europe Middle East North America UK
    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
    Previous ArticleCyber incidents the top risk for 2024 say Airmic members
    Next Article US Secretary of Commerce announces the launch of a consortium dedicated to AI safety

    Related Posts

    An exploding digital padlock illustrates the requirement for post-quantum cryptography.

    Research breakthrough brings reliable quantum computers and Q-day closer to reality

    September 10, 2026
    A danger sign on a digital background.

    New blob URL phishing technique evades detection by using legitimate Microsoft services

    September 10, 2026
    AI risks

    Unmanaged AI workflows expose EMEA organizations to rising compliance and data risks

    September 9, 2026
    City skyline at sunset with bright light trails and a translucent blue smart-city grid overlay and GPS pins indicating locations.

    AI world models: future possibilities for organizational resilience?

    September 7, 2026
    DRJ and BCI logos

    DRJ and BCI publish guidance for governing, managing, and using AI in resilience

    September 7, 2026
    Decision making with over whelming information.

    AI can find the vulnerability. Accountability still sits with your crisis leadership

    September 7, 2026
    Advertisement
    Resilience First
    This week's most read articles
    Under pressure: An egg cracking under pressure applied by squeezing clamps form the sides.

    Managing scenario testing for operational resilience

    May 16, 2024
    COSO logo

    New COSO ERM guidance aims to help organizations with practical implementation

    May 12, 2026
    Close-up of a green-brown iris peering through a jagged tear in dark paper or wall material.

    The blind spots in business continuity

    September 2, 2026
    Latest resources
    The word Glossary surrounded by letter tiles to illustrate The International Resilience Glossary.

    DRI International publishes updated International Glossary for Resilience

    February 27, 2026
    Load More

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

    Most Popular Feature Articles
    Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

    The Dark Triad in crisis management

    Five stage crisis management framework

    A five stage framework for a crisis management process

    Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

    Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

    Latest Reports
    A futuristic red warning alert icon with glowing exclamation mark.

    Cloud Security Alliance publishes Hugging Face Incident Initial Post-Mortem

    A person hold a building door open for a person behind who is tailgating to get unauthorised access.

    Security Culture: A Strategic Capability That Builds Resilience in a Volatile World

    An identity icon with a map marker on it, indicating the concept of identity as a target for attackers. The icon is on a generic IT background predominantly in black and orange.

    Identity-based approaches dominate initial access for ransomware attacks

    A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
    © 2026 Resilience Forward
    • About Resilience Forward
    • Newsletter
    • Newsfeed
    • Advertise
    • Call for Papers
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
    • AI Use Policy

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}
    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Ad Blocker Enabled!
    Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

    Sign In or Register

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below.

    Lost password?