Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Managing resilience»Business continuity»Crisis communications: the tricky balance when it comes to admitting mistakes
Business continuity

Crisis communications: the tricky balance when it comes to admitting mistakes

Organizational mistakes are often the root cause of crises, but should mistakes be admitted to? And how should this be managed?
November 30, 20233 Mins Read
concept shows wooden scale balancing one big ball and four small ones.

CEOs are often in the front-line of crisis communications, but how should messaging be handled when the crisis has been caused by an organizational mistake, or even by a direct mistake by the executive in question?

New research from emlyon business school looks at this area.

Mistakes can harm an organization but also the CEO’s job security, therefore many CEOs don’t admit errors when they happen, however, this risks leaders not learning from these errors; and the organization not changing its practices, making it more likely that the crisis will be repeated.

When there is this clear trade-off between admitting a mistake and potentially losing power and control in the organization, it is important that CEOs use their language effectively to create a safe space for themselves in the organization – but how can they do so? This is the specific research question that Vincent Giolito, Professor of Strategy and Organisation, and Damon Golsorkhi, Professor of Strategic Management at emlyon business school, looked into. To do so, the researchers conducted 21 in-depth interviews with CEOs and board chairs leading 900,000 people in large financial firms in Europe.

The researchers interviewed the CEOs and board chairs on strategic errors in the organization and how they were approached by senior management, as well as the dialect and narrative behind the communication of these errors to all stakeholders. Interestingly, the researchers found a number of key themes that CEOs used for framing these errors.

When discussing key errors with severe economic and/or reputational consequences for the firms and important strategy changes, many CEOs stated that there was a process in which communication follows. First the CEO will acknowledge and diagnose the error, then they will dramatise it to put it into context for stakeholders, and then they will showcase the solution and how they are capitalising on this error to make changes.

The researchers say that it is important to collectivise the issue, using terms like ‘we’ or ‘us’ when discussing the mistake and how to change as a result of it, then there is less blame placed on one person – usually the CEO. Secondly, the researchers use the term, ‘temporalise’, which refers to CEOs showing that the error generates from the organization not adapting or changing quickly enough; and how there is a simple solution to solving the errors – adapting to today’s world quicker.

Thirdly, the researchers say that CEOs should generalise the issue and showcase how all firms in the industry are making the same mistakes, it’s not a firm-level error, but one that many are facing too. And finally, CEOs should isolate the issue, and show that the error is a one-off incident and a rare one; one that will not happen again.

emlyon business school
Europe
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleThe challenges that sell-side firms will face in meeting DORA requirements
Next Article Operational resilience is more than just business continuity says BCBS

Related Posts

An upward trending arrow.

Organizations are being forced to rethink resilience strategies, finds State of IT Infrastructure Resilience study

November 13, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
The numbers 2027 with the 0 replaced with an AI symbol.

From hype to control: AI security, risk management, and governance in 2027

November 13, 2026
Geopolitical risks

Geopolitical conflict is increasingly reshaping how organizations manage people, operations, and risk

November 9, 2026
Abstract network of interconnected nodes and lines in blue.

Everbridge publishes its 2027 Global Risk & Resilience Outlook

November 9, 2026
AI agent in action concept.

Lack of clear activity baselines makes it harder to manage AI agent resilience and security

November 9, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
AI agent in action concept.

Lack of clear activity baselines makes it harder to manage AI agent resilience and security

November 9, 2026
Two different jigsaw pieces.

KPMG Risk & Resilience Survey finds that half of organizations have yet to integrate risk and resilience management

March 12, 2025
A swirl of sand around a rock to show the concept of flexibility.

Organizational flexibility:  developing and managing the ability to be flexible

July 2, 2026
Latest resources
A defrosting retail fridge with water dripping out of the bottom and condensation on the glass.

Protective responses to the refrigeration attacks in Europe

November 4, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
An AI agent icon lying on its side with eyes shut showing the concept of a deactivated agent.

New report reveals major operational resilience gaps in agentic AI adoption

Two hands form a rectangular frame around the sun in a bright sky over distant mountains.

BCI Future of Resilience Report points to a more strategic future for resilience

Global risks concept

UN report warns that the global risk landscape is being redrawn

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?