Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Cyber resilience»75% of UK businesses would break a ransomware payment ban to save their company (Page 20)
Cyber resilience

75% of UK businesses would break a ransomware payment ban to save their company

July 30, 20253 Mins Read
Person in a dark hoodie holding a credit card and making a shushing gesture in front of a laptop.

Commvault has published new research revealing a sharp divide between principle and practice around the proposed UK ban on ransomware payments. While 96% of surveyed UK business leaders from £100 million+ companies believe payments should be banned across both public and private sectors, 75% admit that if a ban was extended to the private sector, they would still pay a ransom if it were the only way to save their organization, regardless of whether civil or criminal penalties applied. 

The proposed ban would legally prohibit ransom payments by public sector organizations and operators of critical national infrastructure (CNI), including schools, NHS trusts, local authorities, and transport, energy, and telecoms providers. All other businesses, including the private sector not covered by the ban, would be required to notify the Government of any intent to pay a ransom. 

Support for a ban is strong in both sectors, as is shown in the survey: 94% support limiting ransom payments for public entities and 99% for private organizations. However, the survey found that in real-world situations within the private sector, if a ban were to take hold, only 10% said they would comply if they were attacked. A further 15% said they would be neither likely nor unlikely to comply. This suggests that while respondents think the ban is a good idea on paper and makes sense for government agencies, if their own company’s survival is at stake, all bets are off. 

Of those who support a proposed payment ban, more than a third (34%) believe it would lead to increased government support and intervention to safeguard cyber resilience. Another third (33%) believe that it would decrease the prevalence of attacks by reducing the incentive for attackers – this is one of the central aims of the ban.  

Given the proliferation of attacks, almost all respondents (98%) said cyber readiness and recovery are a top future spending priority. This reflects growing recognition that the best way to beat ransomware is to focus on resilience and technologies that can enable rapid recoveries, rather than relying on reactive payments, which may or may not help enterprises get their data back.   “Paying a ransom rarely guarantees recovery and often increases the likelihood of being targeted again,” said Darren Thomson, Field CTO EMEAI, Commvault. “A well-enforced ban could help take the profit out of ransomware, but it must be matched by greater investment in prevention, detection, and recovery-testing. Without that, more organizations could find themselves exposed at the worst possible moment, with no viable path to recovery.” 

Research methodology 

This survey was conducted independently and exclusively for Commvault by Censuswide. It reveals the views of 1,000 UK business leaders, from companies with revenue of over £100 million. Data was collected between June 4 and June 6, 2025. 

UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticlePositive signs as Databarracks’ Data Health Check 2025 shows that preparedness is improving
Next Article The UK Government Resilience Action Plan: what’s in it for resilience professionals?

Related Posts

A group of rabbits happily graze while a wolf watches, hidden in the bushes behind them.

Confidence in resilience is outpacing reality, according to new report

November 13, 2026
An upward trending arrow.

Organizations are being forced to rethink resilience strategies, finds State of IT Infrastructure Resilience study

November 13, 2026
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
The numbers 2027 with the 0 replaced with an AI symbol.

From hype to control: AI security, risk management, and governance in 2027

November 13, 2026
Geopolitical risks

Geopolitical conflict is increasingly reshaping how organizations manage people, operations, and risk

November 9, 2026
Abstract network of interconnected nodes and lines in blue.

Everbridge publishes its 2027 Global Risk & Resilience Outlook

November 9, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
AI agent in action concept.

Lack of clear activity baselines makes it harder to manage AI agent resilience and security

November 9, 2026
Two different jigsaw pieces.

KPMG Risk & Resilience Survey finds that half of organizations have yet to integrate risk and resilience management

March 12, 2025
Error page: 'This site can't be reached' message from a browser, indicating connection closed and suggesting checks (reload button visible).

Microsoft outage demonstrates the realities of concentration risks

November 13, 2026
Latest resources
Digital Europe map with stars, symbolizing EU cybersecurity and technology.

ENISA releases guidance to help organizations develop successful cyber security exercises

February 19, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
An AI agent icon lying on its side with eyes shut showing the concept of a deactivated agent.

New report reveals major operational resilience gaps in agentic AI adoption

Two hands form a rectangular frame around the sun in a bright sky over distant mountains.

BCI Future of Resilience Report points to a more strategic future for resilience

Global risks concept

UN report warns that the global risk landscape is being redrawn

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?