Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Cyber resilience»75% of UK businesses would break a ransomware payment ban to save their company
Cyber resilience

75% of UK businesses would break a ransomware payment ban to save their company

July 30, 20253 Mins Read
Person in a dark hoodie holding a credit card and making a shushing gesture in front of a laptop.

Commvault has published new research revealing a sharp divide between principle and practice around the proposed UK ban on ransomware payments. While 96% of surveyed UK business leaders from £100 million+ companies believe payments should be banned across both public and private sectors, 75% admit that if a ban was extended to the private sector, they would still pay a ransom if it were the only way to save their organization, regardless of whether civil or criminal penalties applied. 

The proposed ban would legally prohibit ransom payments by public sector organizations and operators of critical national infrastructure (CNI), including schools, NHS trusts, local authorities, and transport, energy, and telecoms providers. All other businesses, including the private sector not covered by the ban, would be required to notify the Government of any intent to pay a ransom. 

Support for a ban is strong in both sectors, as is shown in the survey: 94% support limiting ransom payments for public entities and 99% for private organizations. However, the survey found that in real-world situations within the private sector, if a ban were to take hold, only 10% said they would comply if they were attacked. A further 15% said they would be neither likely nor unlikely to comply. This suggests that while respondents think the ban is a good idea on paper and makes sense for government agencies, if their own company’s survival is at stake, all bets are off. 

Of those who support a proposed payment ban, more than a third (34%) believe it would lead to increased government support and intervention to safeguard cyber resilience. Another third (33%) believe that it would decrease the prevalence of attacks by reducing the incentive for attackers – this is one of the central aims of the ban.  

Given the proliferation of attacks, almost all respondents (98%) said cyber readiness and recovery are a top future spending priority. This reflects growing recognition that the best way to beat ransomware is to focus on resilience and technologies that can enable rapid recoveries, rather than relying on reactive payments, which may or may not help enterprises get their data back.   “Paying a ransom rarely guarantees recovery and often increases the likelihood of being targeted again,” said Darren Thomson, Field CTO EMEAI, Commvault. “A well-enforced ban could help take the profit out of ransomware, but it must be matched by greater investment in prevention, detection, and recovery-testing. Without that, more organizations could find themselves exposed at the worst possible moment, with no viable path to recovery.” 

Research methodology 

This survey was conducted independently and exclusively for Commvault by Censuswide. It reveals the views of 1,000 UK business leaders, from companies with revenue of over £100 million. Data was collected between June 4 and June 6, 2025. 

UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticlePositive signs as Databarracks’ Data Health Check 2025 shows that preparedness is improving
Next Article The UK Government Resilience Action Plan: what’s in it for resilience professionals?

Related Posts

A solar farm with associated wind turbines.

The resilience challenges of the renewable energy transition

October 2, 2026
Sovereign cloud concept - a digital map of the world is overlaid with multiple cloud icons of different sizes.

Sovereignty and resilience: considerations for organizational leaders

October 2, 2026
A medical worker in a hazmat suit responds to a pandemic victim.

UN pandemic meeting renews preparedness calls but fails to agree declaration

October 1, 2026
Cloned website images overlaid with phishing icons.

Organizational impersonation ranks as top online IP concern: with significant business impacts

October 1, 2026
AI resilience concept.

Survey highlights measures that organizations are considering for improved AI resilience

October 1, 2026
Fragility concept - a human head made up of jigsaw pieces starts to dissolve.

AI efficiency gains can increase organizational fragility

October 1, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
Open lorry car trunk full of moving cardboard boxes and furniture outdoors at city street.

HP Wolf study finds growing concern about attacks on hardware supply chains

August 6, 2024
A solar farm with associated wind turbines.

The resilience challenges of the renewable energy transition

October 2, 2026
Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

April 2, 2025
Latest resources
DRJ and BCI logos

DRJ and BCI publish guidance for governing, managing, and using AI in resilience

September 7, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
Global risks concept

UN report warns that the global risk landscape is being redrawn

Three blank wooden signs against a blue sky.

System restoration is not business continuity: research finds that ‘most cyber recovery plans are built for the wrong outcome’

BCI Continuity and Resilience Report 2026 cover.

BCI report sees growing structural divide between business continuity and resilience

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?