Close Menu
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
More items
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
X (Twitter) LinkedIn
  • Home
  • Managing resilience
    • AI resilience
    • Business continuity
    • Business resilience
    • Climate resilience
    • C-suite and the board
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Operational resilience
    • Organizational resilience
    • Supply chain resilience
    • Technology
  • Risk
    • Enterprise risk management
    • Operational risk
    • Threatscape
  • Cyber resilience
    • Cyber resilience updates
    • DORA – the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act
    • Product updates
Login
LinkedIn Bluesky
Resilience Forward
Subscribe Now
  • All News
  • Research
  • Jobs in Resilience
  • Resilience Resources
  • About Resilience Forward
Resilience Forward
You are at:Home»Managing resilience»C-suite and the board»Five ways that the cyber-resilient CEO acts differently to other CEOs (Page 3)
C-suite and the board

Five ways that the cyber-resilient CEO acts differently to other CEOs

October 9, 20234 Mins Read
The cyber resilient CEO - the image shows a female CEO holding a laptop and looking confident

A new report ‘The Cyber-Resilient CEO’, which was based on a survey of 1,000 CEOs from large organizations from around the world, has identified the top characteristics of CEOs who take a strong approach to organizational cyber resilience.

The Accenture research points to the reactive way in which CEOs treat cyber security, which results in greater risk of attacks and higher costs to respond to and remediate them. It notes that 60% of CEOs said their organizations don’t incorporate cyber security into business strategies, services or products from the outset, and more than four in 10 (44%) of the CEOs believe that cyber security requires episodic intervention rather than ongoing attention.

Adding to this reactive stance is the incorrect assumption by more than half (54%) of CEOs that the cost of implementing cyber security is higher than the cost of suffering a cyber attack despite history showing otherwise. 

In addition, despite 90% of CEOs saying they consider cyber security a differentiating factor for their products or services to help them build trust among customers, only 15% have dedicated board meetings for discussing cyber security issues. This disconnect might be explained by the fact that the vast majority (91%) of CEOs said cyber security is a technical function that is the responsibility of the CIO or chief information security officer.

The report also suggests that generative AI holds the potential to introduce a greater level of advanced security threats introducing new challenges that even best-practice cyber defenses may not fully address. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of CEOs surveyed said that cybercriminals could use generative AI to create sophisticated and hard-to-detect cyber attacks, such as phishing scams, social engineering attacks and automated hacks.

The acceleration of generative AI makes it even more essential for organizations to take measures to ensure the security of their data and digital assets. Unfortunately, it is often only after they experience a material cyber incident that they elevate cyber security to a board-level and C-suite priority and expand expectations beyond technology functions to better protect their organizations. Integrating cyber security risk into an enterprise risk management framework is the key to ensuring better security, regulatory compliance, business protection and customer trust.

Paolo Dal Cin, global lead of Accenture Security.

The research identifies a small group of CEOs who excel at cyber resilience. This group—which Accenture calls ‘cyber-resilient CEOs’ and accounts for 5% of respondents—uses a wider lens to assess cyber security across all aspects of their organizations. The companies of these leaders detect, contain and remediate cyber threats faster than other organizations. As a result, their breach costs are considerably lower and financial performance significantly better than the rest, achieving 16% higher incremental revenue growth, 21% more cost-reduction improvements, and 19% healthier balance-sheet improvements, on average.

On the flip side are ‘cyber laggards’ — accounting for nearly half (46%) of the CEOs—who don’t consistently or rigorously take any of the actions that cyber-resilient CEOs do and are typically stuck in a reactionary mode.

Five actions that cyber-resilient CEOs are far more likely than cyber laggards to take proactively are:

  • Embedding cyber resilience in the business strategy from the start. Cyber-resilient CEOs are nearly twice as likely to manage cyber performance in the same way they manage financial performance (60% vs. 33%).
  • Establishing shared cyber security accountability across the organization. Cyber-resilient CEOs are far more likely adopt shared accountability across the c-suite, inspiring executives to champion cyber security as a competitive differentiator that accelerates innovation safely (68% vs. 37%) and work closely with their CISOs to assess and manage the risks of generative AI, ensuring that the technology is used safely and effectively (54% vs. 33%).
  • Securing the digital core at the heart of the organization. Cyber-resilient CEOs are more than twice as likely to say they plan to boost their cybersecurity budget as the adoption and implementation of digital and emerging technologies intensifies (76% vs. 35%).
  • Extending cyber resilience beyond organizational boundaries and silos. Cyber-resilient CEOs are 40% more likely to implement specific policies and controls for third parties and even more likely to promote an enterprise-wide risk assessment approach that cuts across business units and functions (64% vs. 41%).
  • Embracing ongoing cyber resilience to stay ahead of the curve. Cyber-resilient CEOs are far more likely to commit to continually establishing industry-leading cyber security measures that take into account the changing risk landscape and align with c-suite priorities in order to protect the business and detect and respond effectively to cyberattacks (60% vs. 34%).

Methodology

Accenture Research surveyed 1,000 CEOs from large organizations (revenues > US$1 billion) across 19 industries and 15 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, and the Middle East. The goal was to determine their organization’s level of cyber resilience and approach to cyber security business practices. The survey was conducted online in June 2023.


Read the full report here.

Asia Pacific Europe Middle East North America UK
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email WhatsApp
Previous ArticleRansomware dwell time now less than 24 hours: reducing the opportunity to detect
Next Article ESG risks: new data shows an increase in greenwashing activities

Related Posts

An exploding digital padlock illustrates the requirement for post-quantum cryptography.

Research breakthrough brings reliable quantum computers and Q-day closer to reality

September 10, 2026
A danger sign on a digital background.

New blob URL phishing technique evades detection by using legitimate Microsoft services

September 10, 2026
AI risks

Unmanaged AI workflows expose EMEA organizations to rising compliance and data risks

September 9, 2026
City skyline at sunset with bright light trails and a translucent blue smart-city grid overlay and GPS pins indicating locations.

AI world models: future possibilities for organizational resilience?

September 7, 2026
DRJ and BCI logos

DRJ and BCI publish guidance for governing, managing, and using AI in resilience

September 7, 2026
Decision making with over whelming information.

AI can find the vulnerability. Accountability still sits with your crisis leadership

September 7, 2026
Advertisement
Resilience First
This week's most read articles
Under pressure: An egg cracking under pressure applied by squeezing clamps form the sides.

Managing scenario testing for operational resilience

May 16, 2024
COSO logo

New COSO ERM guidance aims to help organizations with practical implementation

May 12, 2026
Close-up of a green-brown iris peering through a jagged tear in dark paper or wall material.

The blind spots in business continuity

September 2, 2026
Latest resources
UK Resilience Academy logo

Wargaming in a Resilience Context

August 18, 2026
Load More

Subscribe to Updates

Get our Resilience Updates newsletter.

Most Popular Feature Articles
Three dark coloured light bulbs on a black background illustrate the concept of The Dark Triad in Crisis Management.

The Dark Triad in crisis management

Five stage crisis management framework

A five stage framework for a crisis management process

Blue interconnected gears and network nodes symbolizing automation and complex machinery.

Agent zero – the 2028 digital pandemic

Latest Reports
A futuristic red warning alert icon with glowing exclamation mark.

Cloud Security Alliance publishes Hugging Face Incident Initial Post-Mortem

A person hold a building door open for a person behind who is tailgating to get unauthorised access.

Security Culture: A Strategic Capability That Builds Resilience in a Volatile World

An identity icon with a map marker on it, indicating the concept of identity as a target for attackers. The icon is on a generic IT background predominantly in black and orange.

Identity-based approaches dominate initial access for ransomware attacks

A promo box for an article about resilience governance.
© 2026 Resilience Forward
  • About Resilience Forward
  • Newsletter
  • Newsfeed
  • Advertise
  • Call for Papers
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy and Cookie Use
  • AI Use Policy

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Manage Cookie Consent
To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behaviour or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Ad Blocker Enabled!
Our website is made possible by displaying online advertisements to our visitors. Please support us by disabling your Ad Blocker.

Sign In or Register

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below.

Lost password?